Lora's Latest Post

Good-bye to a Global Pioneer

Last week, while I was in Shanghai, attending the IBF Forecasting Conference, I learned of the death of Dick Clark. Dick, the Demand Planning Global Process Owner at Procter & Gamble, was always one of my favorite interviews for my reports. Not only was he smart and insightful, but he was also a fighter. He fought for demand planning excellence, and after many years of a heroic fight of brain and lung cancer, Dick slipped away last Sunday following a heart attack.  He leaves a network of trained global planners within the Procter & Gamble system that will carry on his legacy.

Remembering a Legacy

Five years ago, in an interview, Dick and I spoke of China and the barriers to building a team of planners in the explosive economy. At that time, I had just returned from Shanghai and was disappointed to not find more planning talent at the supply chain events. Dick had just finished training all of the P&G regions on forecasting and had spent months on the road with his in-country teams. We shared notes. We talked about what makes good global planning, and how to best use regional observations. It was one of my favorite discussions with Dick, and it was especially poignant as I watched a group of 60 planners register for the IBF certification/conference. ( I could not find a planner at a conference five years ago.)
Coming back from China, I wanted to talk to Dick about my observations. I wanted to share that while I could not find planners at conferences five years ago, that I was very impressed with the quality, focus and intent of the planners that came to the IBF conference. I felt that I witnessed a focus on planning that was not possible five years ago. I wanted to thank him for his service to improve the practice of forecasting. Unfortunately, this will not be possible. Instead, I hung my head and spent an hour walking outside thinking about what I learned from Dick Clark.

What I learned from Dick

Dick was very giving and always prepared for my interviews. He never turned down an opportunity. Here are some of my key takeaways from the many discussions:
A good forecast is used: My first analyst report was “What Makes a Good Forecast”. While other practicioners spoke of numbers, models and technologies, Dick took a much more pragmatic approach. In his opinion, the best forecasts are used. He was working to improve consistency in the data, reliability in reporting and simplicity in data representation.
Organizational change is slow, be patient: He had been at this for over twenty years. We spoke of bias and error and the need for organizational alignment. His caution was that success comes in inches not miles. He believe that with the consolidation of major manufacturers that the evolution of great demand planning practices required a slow and consistent focus. He believed one of the most important attributes for his team was patience.
 Forecasting teams must be trained: Dick was a stickler for training. What I thought should be obvious, Dick explained was not so obvious, especially in emerging economies. He believed that the teams should be trained in region and that it was his role to slowly build the skills. He dedicated his life to this legacy.
Look for new ways to do things: Dick was one of the earliest adopters of Advanced Planning Systems (APS) and he was always scouting for new technologies. He had the courage to push the adoption of what was then a little known technology provider, Terra Technology, and he was confident to invest in co-development with a small, and emerging technology vendor. He understood that it was harder to do co-development with large technology providers, and was willing to take risks.
Give back to the practice: In the years that he fought cancer with radiation and chemotherapy, I frequently ran into Dick on the speaker circuit. While many would have withdrawn to heal, Dick continued to give. I watched him give a speech last December with a disfigured face and slurred speech from radiation. At break, I asked about his treatment if he was ok to travel. He commented that he was not ready to die. He fought. He gave, and he believed.
Supply chain management practices are maturing in China. Most of the planners that came to the event were from major corporations that had been mentored by the Dick Clark’s of their organization. Thank-you Dick, and all of the other early pioneers that paved the way for global supply chains.  I want to say thanks for all that you did.
Dick, may you rest in peace. I will miss you.

Search the Archives
Search
Share this Post
Email
Twitter
LinkedIn
Facebook
Pinterest
WhatsApp
Featured Image
Recent Posts

Navigating Supply Chain Economic Downturns

In 2007, the average company took six months to sense market shifts and adapt its supply chain. My estimate, based on work with clients, is that if a downturn happened today, the average company would take 20-30% more time to adjust than in 2007. Here I give insights on preparedness.

Read More »

Warning: Sidestep the Narrative of the Misguided Goldiggers

Ten years ago, I started writing a book titled Stories of the Misguided Gold Diggers. The book was a collection of stories from two decades of stories of technology leaders perpetuating the myth of integrated end-to-end supply chain planning.

I dusted off the manuscript on Saturday. I think that we have a new chapter. Companies focused on putting Artificial Intelligence (AI) on top of existing architectures are putting AI Stupid on steroids.

Read More »

The Myth of End-to-End Planning

Supply chain planning, supply management, supply chain execution, network design, and transportation/logistics management operate in silos. Not much has changed over four decades. The connections flow back through transactional systems: order-to-cash and procure-to-pay. There is a myth that companies can buy an end-to-end supply chain management solution. This is largely a myth. Here we explain.

Read More »

Lead Time: A Broken Gossamer

If you are struggling with supply chain planning, dancing in the light of shiny objects, and scratching your head, please read on. My goal is to help you.

Please do not AI Stupid. What do I mean? AI Stupid is putting agents and agentics on top of existing architectures believing that making them faster and hands free add value. To me, this is fools play.

I love AI. I am excited about new technologies. To this end, I want to shine a light on how new technologies can help address the black holes and inconsistencies in today’s supply chain, which largely stem from the limitations of the first generation of supply chain planning and execution technologies. In this blog, I give you three places to start.

Read More »

Do You Need a Supply Chain Coach?

Supply chain is where the rubber hits the road. For a public company, over 40% of market capitalization is tied to the trade-offs between growth, operating margin, inventory management, and Return on Capital Employed.

The road for supply chain improvement is fraught with issues. Here we share some and offer some advice.

Read More »

Is your Supply Chain AI Ready?

A simple quiz to assess an organization’s AI readiness.

The pace of change is fast and furious. Every day, technology advances faster than we can digest. A great challenge to have.

Determining whether a supply chain is “AI-ready” is less about technology and more about the gray matter between the ears of supply chain leaders. Leadership, alignment, and clarity of goals matter.

Too few companies are clear on the definition of supply chain excellence. Measuring and rewarding functional metrics reduces the firm’s value. Putting agentics on top of today’s processes can make bad practices run faster, reducing value.

The toughest job for the supply chain leader is challenging existing supply chain paradigms that were defined by the limitations of decades of supply chain technologies. As the curtain lifts on the potential of new forms of technology, process redefinition is our opportunity, but only if we are clear on what drives value. (Here, I link to the Supply Chains to Admire reports to help you define value. The next report will be published on June 23rd, along with my Dynamic Benchmarking Product, to help you define value in the face of your AI readiness. More information about the launch is at the bottom of this blog.)

Read More »